Dec 232010
 

NB: I’m in an extremely bad mood, due to the snow, cancellations, work and such. Hence this whinefest, bitchiness and lack of humour. Excuse me.

I just read an outline from a hopeful and it just makes me want to cry. Here is it. Misspellings and all. (I’ve removed the character’s name to avoid having it identified.)

The Western Front in Franch 1919.

CHARACTER NAME of a Britsh platoon faces the biggest challange of his life…
….
….
the worlds most powerful and most superme army…
….
….
NAZI ZOMBIES OF THE THIRD REICH!

Why do you do this to me, hopeful? Nazism in the First World War? 1919, a year after WWI ended? Franch? Britsh? Superme? And those ellipses? Are you a descendant of Dame Barbara or something?

And you know what pisses me off the most? I have to work with you on this. If I was still in my old job, I’d kick you and your crappy proposal out of my life in two seconds. The reality is that I’m working for the client who seems to love your crappy proposal.

And also, the idea of fact-checking something like this just makes me want to

*headdesk*

*headdeskheaddesk*

*headdeskheaddeskheaddesk*

Right now, I feel like a drunk elephant dancing on the head of a pin and ready to kill someone. Namely you. In my head, of course.

I don’t know why I’m wound up and so unreasonably sensitive. The kind where books and films fail to distract or relax me. And the kind that will produce headlines like “Trampling across the snowy hills, a senseless cow screams incoherently and, with a penknife, stabs a few street lamps along the way”. I can’t believe how tired and wound up I feel. I’m a little concerned, actually. I have too much work to do and I won’t get any done when I’m like this.

Change of subject: Cliques on blogs, twitter and message boards

For a long time – years, in fact – I didn’t understand why some newbies thought some blogs or hang outs were such a bunch of cliques. Well, now I get it. Somewhat.

As you know, I recently had to change my online name to get away from that dickhead. This does mean erase seven years’ worth of history under M a i l i (I used my working name before this), but I wasn’t bothered. I figured regulars would either figure it out by recognising my writing or don’t give a fuck. It’s fine either way. So I became FiaQ.

And man, it was an experience I didn’t expect to have.

Not knowing who I was, some regulars responded to my comments/questions just the same and some regulars ignored my responses. When I made it clear somehow that I was M a i l i, they responded warmly, which deepened my surprise. It made realise what the others may have experienced.

Even so, it still doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a bad thing.

I mean when you move to a new area, you don’t expect neighbours to welcome you as their newest best friend, do you? They need time to get know to you and you them. So I still think the ‘clique’ charge is unwarranted in this respect.

I now can see how some may feel left out or ignored when their comments or questions are ignored. Or when regulars talk about something that seems to be an inside joke or secret code.

I’m hoping desperately that I didn’t do this to the others, but I suspect I did sometimes. I like to think it was due to lack of time and laziness than rudeness. I think this applies to some others.

It also reminded me that everyone has to make an effort by posting regularly, giving the others a chance to get know their online personalities and tastes. Under M a i l i, I had a decade’ worth of opportunities for the others to get know to me whereas as FiaQ, I have zero, which makes me a newbie to many.

After this experience, it’s likely I won’t be so dismissive towards the complaints about being ignored. I’d probably dish out the same advice I gave for years: post more often, engage in more discussions, take it easy, don’t worry about what others think of them, just write about what it interests them, and their opinions aren’t right or wrong. Don’t worry if a book that everyone loved so much isn’t their cup of tea.

It’s made me realise I have to work hard again, building my ‘history’ under FiaQ. Half of me feels “Fuck that, I’ll just announce I’m M a i l i, the hell with the consequences” and the other half of me thinks “Oh, that’ll teach me to be humble and learn to grow from scratch”. Laziness vs adventure, basically.

I have to be honest: it affects my ego sometimes when a regular assumed I was a newbie. She lectured at me about a book, the comm or whatnot. I have to admit: it seriously pissed me off. It’s made me realise this is how some long-time lurkers and “newbies” might feel. I’m definitely guilty of this charge. Too many times, in fact. Do me a favour; next time I do this, slap me. Slap me really hard, all right?

All that said, I was disappointed in myself. A newbie last year complained about the rudeness of a regular, whom I adored, and I thought she talked crazy. The regular was one of friendliest and most responsive people I knew online. Yeah, I didn’t believe the newbie. I think I was even patronising by saying she could be too sensitive, just relax and enjoy. I was so wrong to say that. Well, not wrong, but I could at least not assume the fault lay with her and her alone. I was wrong about that, definitely, especially after learning that under FiaQ, not only the regular completely ignored a repeated question I made, she was surprisingly rude.

Figured that she missed the Q twice in a week, I said “My poor question will die of starvation if you don’t answer” (about a review on her blog) and she (finally) responded, something along the line of “I’m busy”. But she was joking and chatting with the others during this time. It wasn’t a hard question, either. If she had the time to say “I’m busy”, then she certainly had the time to say “yes”, “no” or “I don’t know”. I was annoyed enough to say, “Come on, don’t be such a cow and answer the bloody Q.” She didn’t respond.

Later this day, I posted a response on a different blog accidentally under M a i l i, this regular wrote a response along the line of “Where have you been?! I miss you so much!” She didn’t seem to realise I was FiaQ. Two completely different responses to – unknown to this regular, obviously – one person with two different names in one day. It left me honestly nonplussed. I now can see why some found her rude, but in spite of this hic-cup, I still adore her.

Like I said, I still don’t believe there are ‘cliques’, but I do now believe that people treat people differently. I still think, though, that sometimes it’s a case of timing. Not everyone saw responses or questions immediately, so it’s a good idea to wait a day or so, or repeat at a later date.

Also, right or wrong, some don’t have much spare time so they prioritise friends over strangers. It makes sense if you think about it. I still think one shouldn’t take it personally, though. While I was annoyed with that regular during that moment, I didn’t take it personally. It’s just the way the Internet is.

While I’m having a great time as FiaQ, I feel guilty changing names without notice and about people talking to me without realising who I am. It felt dishonest sometimes. I wonder if authors felt this way about pen names? I mean what if a former school friend wrote you a gushy fan letter without realising you were the one she used to bully at school? Heh! That would make a good story, actually. :D

Gah, I really can’t wait for March to come. I’m on my knees hoping that that dickhead will get sacked soon. He screwed up a work project last week and the head manager still isn’t happy.

  5 Responses to “Random: The Feck? / Cliques online”

  1. It must be a very odd to interact with people you’ve known online for years with a name they don’t recognize. I used to post under a different name, but never often enough for it to count when I changed to SarahT.

    I hope that fecker gets sacked soon. :D

  2. Geez, your comments make me hope I never not respond to people who I don’t know–I figured out pretty quick who you are, but before I hope I was polite.

    And I hate the clique-y comments that could be dealt with in IM, not on Twitter. I think I am guilty of that sometimes, and it bothers me.

  3. Yes! This! I recently was whining to a friend about all the comments that end with “you know who you are.” Look, if the people bloody well know who they are there’s no need to add that. Saying that simply goes to say “by the way it’s not a bunch of YOU.” This has been running through my head for a while but dunno if I’ll ever write it out.
    Of course we all like to feel special and part of an elite group.
    Or, there may be one person who you just hate and you ignore him/her across the board because interacting with the person makes you want to stab yourself in the eye with a rusty fork.

    Also – am so glad I/you “discovered” you again. I’d been wondering where you were and didn’t know about the name change. I’m guilty of not really reaching out, but I do try to respond to everyone talks to/at me.

    I’m just lazy, have no attention span, and generally hate people :X

  4. How interesting. There’s a book by Paul Bloom — which I know about *only* because I heard an interview with him on the radio — called, “How Pleasure Works.” In it, he has various stories about how people valued things a LOT less when they didn’t know what they were (famous violinist playing a Stradivarius in the D.C. Metro only makes $32 in tips) or when they learned what they had was a fake (Goring’s fake Vermeer).

    So what you’re telling us is that a regular ignored you qua total stranger but loves you qua M a i l i.

    I mostly know the people who comment at Promantica, but there’s one person whom I don’t know, or I don’t know if I know her. So I have to treat her as well as if she’s secretly my best friend. Because she might be.

    Which is very Golden Rule, innit?

  5. In comparison to you, I am a relative newbie on the whole romance/blog/virtual conversation thing. My virtual presence only started in February 2009 and that has been predominately on Twitter (though I have on the rare occasion such as today, been motivated to write more than 140 characters). Since I entered this virtual world, I have never felt that anyone behaved in an exclusionary manner. Certainly, there is an inner circle that know each other very well, from reading interests, home life & professional lives but that is the norm in any group. And seeing many of these conversations has made me go out & read a lot more than I had ever anticipated (this is a good thing).

    As for being cliquey, FiaQ. You’re not. I know we have had many a twitversation but you openly responded to my first few comments last year. And the same goes with the majority of people on Twitter. As for blog responses, if some bloggers are receiving in excess of 30-50 responses per blog it is a bit much to expect everyone to get a personalised message back. It’s just not feasible.

    And sometimes, just like in the physical world, people just don’t want to make new acquaintances and they like passing secret notes to each other. That’s fine too. Woody Allen used to boast that there were some in jokes in his movies that only 2 other people would get. Top stuff. Lots of power to those who do it.

    Enjoy your new persona. Incognito can be a good thing too :)

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>